The cost of a screening failure in defense is measured in lives

Recruiting and screening

The cost of a screening failure in defense is measured in lives

For defense organizations, the wrong recruit isn’t just a bad hire - they’re an active threat to personnel, operations, and national security from the moment they enter the pipeline. But the methods most defense organizations rely on to screen candidates are increasingly vulnerable to countermeasures from sophisticated adversaries, dependent on sparse background data, or include time- and resource-intensive processes.

Every day a bad actor stays in your pipeline, your exposure escalates

Once a bad actor has gained access to your system, every subsequent day of training, access, and armed service represents a live and escalating security risk. Today’s systems create friction for commanders and security officers needing to fulfill the mission-critical force protection imperative, as well as for the candidates on the ground and in the pipeline.

The most consequential personnel decisions demand the most reliable risk signal

01
The questions
A short set of yes-or-no questions, answered by personnel.
02
The signal
Clearspeed analyzes for risk signals in the vocal response.
03
The indicator
You receive a clear risk indicator in real time.
Minimal risk
Route and approve
Personnel are cleared. No delay, no friction.
Elevated risk
Follow up for review
The cases that need a closer look, get one.

How Clearspeed adds precision to candidate vetting at scale

Clearspeed provides a fundamentally different approach to the most critical trust decisions defense organizations make. A few yes-or-no questions, with analysis grounded in decades of neuroscience, for precise risk assessment at scale.